Color, simplification, and ownable assets are on the rise

We’re sharing our field notes as brand and brand systems designers and asking ourselves and you, “How might we translate what we’ve noticed into brands and brand systems tailored to your values and reputation, with the goal to help you communicate more effectively?”

Note: This content grew out of a LMA Midwest conversation we hosted on brand trends where we shared our “in the wild” observation of: LinkedIn web and brand refresh announcements, select list of Chambers-recognized firms’ websites, and our behind-the-scenes collaborative work with marketers evolving and launching brands. We’ll continue updating this post as we gather more insights and questions from legal marketers like you.

Want to provide your insight on a recent or past rebrand? Fill out this form and we’ll get in touch.

Reactions, Not Judgments

Trend watching is only useful if it helps us see things in new ways or see patterns that relate to a question we have.

We wanted to know:

• What’s showing up recently and repeatedly in law firm branding?
• How might this impact our clients?
• What are the real-life strategies that will be affected so that a brand system can be used by real humans under real deadlines?

Why now? Branded collateral and internal documents are increasingly digital-first (and often mobile-first), making things utilitarian can be easier, recruiting pressures keep rising, and internal complexity keeps growing — more practices, more offices, more templates, more demands on time and attention.

Trends become useful when they help you:

• Make decisions (what to standardize vs. where to flex to meet a particular moment)
• Build templates that hold up (pitch decks, proposals, social, event materials)
• Governance people want to engage with (without constant policing)
• Earn buy-in (partners, practice leaders, internal stakeholders)

3 Law Firm Branding Trends at a Glance

• Trend 1: Color — bolder, more intentional palettes that do heavier recognition work than simply “accenting” the logo.
• Trend 2: Simplification — shorter names, fewer logo elements, clearer hierarchy, and less noise.
• Trend 3: Ownable Assets — repeatable visual building blocks that create recognition in combination with assets beyond the logo.

Our experience in action with trends? Legal marketers don’t adopt trends. We see you consider and select what supports your positioning among competitors on timelines that align with the firm’s strategic plan.

When do color, simplification, and ownable assets show up in law firm branding?

They show up when the brand gets an update, launches a new website, and on social. They get stress-tested in: web components, PowerPoint master slides, proposal and pitch templates, recruiting toolkits, event signage, thought leadership PDFs, email headers, and social post systems. They also show up in the “gray zone” — co-branded events, practice initiatives, and holiday campaigns — where teams feel pressure to stand out without drifting off-brand.

Trend 1: Color

In short: Color is carrying significantly more brand recognition, systemization, and storytelling across law firm websites and socials.

What we’re noticing in color:

• Less standard greens, blues, and reds; more exaggeration of warmer and cooler versions of individual colors;
• Brand and secondary colors used more boldly and liberally, not just for accents
• More color contrast and more intentional use of color blocks
• Use of secondary palettes to differentiate practices, industries, or content categories
• More colorful “neutrals” with addition depth including warmer grays, off-whites, deep blues and greens instead of neutral grays

What color may be signaling:

• Law firms want distinctiveness without dependence on their logo alone
• Digital readability/accessibility is pushing more deliberate contrast choices
• Channel volume is up, content output is up, and color becomes a fast path to cohesion
• Teams need clearer “roles” for color to avoid subjective debates
• Broader brand culture has seen an upward trend in bold and intentional color use and trends take time to sink into professional services

Brand system alert: COLOR

The immediacy and power of color recognition breaks down when it isn’t mapped to real usage. A palette can look beautiful in guidelines and still fail once it hits web modules, social templates, event kits, and proposals. If color is doing more heavy lifting, it needs roles (what each color is for), ratios (how much is too much), and examples that show what happens when five different offices create materials in the same week.

A counter-signal worth holding: research suggests color choices can also influence perceptions like “status,” and more saturated color isn’t automatically “better” for every brand posture.

Trend 2: Simplification

In short: Simplification is often a response to complexity, but in the case of law firm brands, there are more important considerations.

What we’re noticing is fading or missing:

• Firms continue to shorten names to align with their clients’ and firm vernacular
• Shorter names are easier to remember and design logos for
• Less density in web layouts with more whitespace and fewer competing elements that work on desktop and mobile devices
• Logos/wordmarks are slimming down details like PLLP, LLP, Attorneys at Law for small-screen clarity
• Fewer monogram icons; more subtle details in the wordmark itself

What this simplification trend may be signaling:

• Digital-first reality: logos have to work in tight digital spaces on your own channels as well as on advertising or sponsorship placements
• The logo can’t do everything anymore — additional brand assets of color, imagery, and non-logo typography are playing larger roles in brand recognition
• Intentional departure from previous branding eras where serif, all-cap typography was the default moving quickly toward sans-serif typography
• Younger, emerging leaders in firm management as firms accumulate years and founders retire

One outside example we reviewed in the broader brand landscape was Adobe’s recent evolution that combined their symbol and wordmark into their new, bolder logotype and codified system assets like their bold, red framing device for imagery, showing how “simple” can still be distinctive and dramatic when systemized and based on strategy.

Brand system alert: SIMPLIFICATION

Simplification can’t only mean “make it minimal.” To us, the call is to “make it simple to use.” A real-life-tested brand system should reduce decision fatigue, increase speed, and make governance easier — because fewer moving parts are easier to teach and enforce.

Simplification can and has backfired by removing recognizable and valued brand assets. People notice, and with the ease of sharing feedback, the move can become a hot topic, especially if the move doesn’t align with how your audiences perceive your brand. You only need to google Cracker Barrel’s attempted logo simplification and quick reversal. On the other hand, simplification (or its opposite) can intentionally signal a strategic change in an organization like Jaguar’s rebrand.

Trend 3: Ownable Assets

In short: Law firms are building recognition through repeatable and integrated assets. The literal fusing of assets together or heavily relying on stylistic photography, graphic cropping devices, customized typefaces, and more are taking shape across law firm website design. “Ownable assets” are repeatable visual building blocks such as shapes, patterns, imagery rules and styling, icon styles, layout motifs, motion, and microinteraction principles — that people learn to associate with your firm. They create recognition beyond the logo, especially when many teams and vendors are producing work.

These unique combinations of assets can hold the brand’s recognition even when the logo is small, absent, or competing in co-branded spaces.

What we’re noticing in ownable assets:

• More specific imagery style rules that go beyond subject matter. Angles, crops, lighting, contrast, color, emotive facial expressions, and body poses result in an elevated level of brand recognition
• Integration of graphic elements with photography like framing devices, overlays, and  beyond the circle/square/rectangle crop
• Illustration style that feels and looks intentional
• Layout motifs and motion principles that travel across web/social/video

What this ownable assets trend may be signaling:

• Firms want differentiation that isn’t “louder,” just more recognizable
• Ownable assets help cohesion when many offices and creators are producing materials
• Co-branded events and sponsorships require recognition without relying on logo dominance
• Authenticity is rising in photography (more natural expressions and perspectives), which demands clearer style rules and better planning

Note: There’s also another practical reality in legal to be compliant and ethical in imagery selection. Communication through imagery can’t be false or misleading like people who may be viewed as firm attorneys.

Brand system alert: OWNABLE ASSETS

Ownable assets further protect recognition and differentiation of your brand across multiple channels. But they also provide another key advantage: flexibility and variation. With content output increasing in social posts, podcasts, video and in-person presentations, events, and more demanding graphic assets, the ability to deploy ownable assets provides legal marketers more options to appeal to a variety of audiences.

This is also where “user-friendly” matters. The best ownable assets are the ones a BD team, a practice admin, and an external vendor can all use without needing a design degree or heavy oversight by marketing.

How we think about trends without chasing them

We consider trends as ideas and signals — defining what is happening at a certain moment and thinking about how they might seep into law firm branding. We ask, “Which of our clients wants to be more forward-thinking in how they represent their brand? Which of their competitors is already doing so? What are the ways these trends align with firm values and reputation? And then pressure-test them in real-life applications and in context. If you can’t systemize it, it’s not a brand move; it’s a one-off design moment.

Five-question law firm brand trends checklist:

1. Does this trend support our law firm positioning and the client experience we’re delivering and want to deliver in the future?
2. Can this trend scale across practices, offices, materials, and channels (web, pitch decks, proposals, recruiting)?
3. Can our legal marketing team govern adoption without constant policing (clear rules, templates, approvals)?
4. Does the trend increase clarity and credibility in real usage (not just in a brand deck)?
5. How long do we anticipate its lifecycle and when will we re-evaluate use?

What’s next?

Trends are signals. Strategy is choosing what fits. Building a system people will actually use is brand growth. If color is getting bolder, decide what role it plays in hierarchy and templates and where it doesn’t belong. If simplification is showing up, make sure it is part of a larger brand asset system that can support recognition. If ownable assets are emerging, develop modular building blocks that can flex across content and channels.

Which of these is your law firm feeling pressure around right now: color, simplification, or creating ownable assets?

Key takeaways:

• Trends matter when they help you make decisions you can systemize.
• Color and simplification work best when mapped to real templates and governance.
• Ownable assets build recognition beyond the law firm logo — especially across many creators and co-branded moments.